Shepway District Council

Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, Kent. CT20 2QY
T: 01303 853000
F: 01303 245978

Find Us: By Car | By Train | Walking

Good Evening. Welcome to Shepway District Council
Back to the home page

Text size : Increase Text Size Decrease Text Size Reset Text Size    Translate this website : English | Française | Italiana | Deutsche | Española

Navigation


Main Content



Council - performance indicators

PDF  Print  E-mail 



The following table provides information on how the Council is performing against the Best Value Performance Indicators (BVPIs) with comparisons to previous years and how we rank nationally against other district councils.

Performance against BVPIs 2003/04 - 2007/08

performance is among the top 25% of District Councils = 2006/07 performance is among the top 25% of District Councils performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils = 2006/07 performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils = 2006/07 performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils = 2006/07 performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

Green  Highlighted Good Performance  Red  Highlighted Poor Performance 

Benefit Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV76a
 
Number of claimants visited/1000 caseload 607 429 456  444   483    
BV76b Number of fraud investigators/1000 caseload 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.21 0.2    
BV76c
 
Number of fraud investigations/1000 caseload 85 88 109 115 122    
BV76d
 
Number of prosecutions and sanctions/1000 caseload 10.5 8 5.5 5.35 5.36    
BV78a
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils
Average time for processing new claims (days) 44
Reduced performance on previous year 
57
Reduced performance on previous year
55
Improved performance on previous year 
43
Improved performance on previous year
34.94 Tick Tick
BV78b
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils
Average time for processing changes of circumstance (days) 13
Improved performance on previous year
19
Reduced performance on previous year 
37
Reduced performance on previous year
23
Improved performance on previous year 
16.37 Tick  

BV79a  performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils

%of cases where benefit calculation was correct 99.6%
Improved performance on previous year
97.8%
Reduced performance on previous year 
98.4%
Improved performance on previous year 
97.6%
Reduced performance on previous year 
 96.0% Tick  
BV79bi performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % of Benefit overpayments (HB) deemed recoverable that were recovered New New 59.5% 68.77%
Improved performance on previous year
 54.49%    
BV79bii performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils Benefit overpayments recovered as a % of Benefit overpayment debt New New 29.4% 23.6%
Reduced performance on previous year
 20.92%    
BV79biii Benefit overpayments written off asa % of Benefit overpayment debt New New 6.4% 6.92% 3.31%    
BV80 performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

Claimant satisfaction with:

             
 

a) Facilities to get in touch

a) 74% a) 74%
Improved performance on previous year
a) 74%
Improved performance on previous year

 69%

Reduced performance on previous year
Not available for 2007/08 Tick  
 

b) Service in the benefit office

b) 76% b) 76%
Improved performance on previous year
 b) 76%
Improved performance on previous year
 69%
Reduced performance on previous year
Not availalbe for 2007/08    
 

c) Benefit telephone service

c) 53% c) 53%
Improved performance on previous year
 c) 53%
Improved performance on previous year
 53% Not available for 2007/08    
 

d) Staff in the benefit office

d) 81% d)81%
Improved performance on previous year
 d) 81%
Improved performance on previous year
 72%
Reduced performance on previous year
Not available for 2007/08    
 

e) Clarity of claim form, leaflets and letters

e) 59% e)59%
Improved performance on previous year
 e) 59%
Improved performance on previous year
 51%
Reduced performance on previous year
Not available for 2007/08    
 

f) Time taken to determine claim

f) 68% f)68%
Improved performance on previous year
 f) 68%
Improved performance on previous year
 52%
Reduced performance on previous year
Not available for 2007/08    
 

g) The overall benefit service

g) 77% g) 77%  g) 77%  62%
Reduced performance on previous year
Not availalbe for 2007/08    
                 

Community Safety Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref

Description

          SDC CPA
BV126
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

Burglaries per 1000 households

9.2
Improved performance on previous year
8.4
Improved performance on previous year
7.2
Improved performance on previous year
4.0
Improved performance on previous year

 8.4

   
BV127a performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils

Violent Crime per 1000 population

n/a New 19.6 18.36
Improved performance on previous year
16.6    
BV127b performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

Robberies per 1000 population

n/a New 0.5 0.71
arrowdown_1.gif
0.6    
BV128
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils

Vehicle crimes per 1000 population

8.6
Improved performance on previous year 
8.8
Reduced performance on previous year 
7.3
Improved performance on previous year 
8.4
Reduced performance on previous year 
7.0    
BV174

Number of racial incident recorded per 100,000 population

0 0 0 1 0    
BV175

% of racial incidents that resulted in further action

100% 100% 100% 100% N/A   Tick 
BV176
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

Number of domestic violence refuge places per 10,000 population

0.7
Same performance
0.7
Same performance
0.7
Same performance
0.7
Same performance
0.7   Tick 
BV225 (NEW)

Score against checklist of local council services to help victims of domestic violence

New 50% 55%
Improved performance on previous year
64%
Improved performance on previous year
 73%    
BV226a
(NEW)

Spend on legal advice/guidance provided by external organisations

New £57,000 £57,000 £57,000 £57,000    
BV226b
(NEW)
Spend on legal advice services given to organisations holding the CLS Quality Mark at "General Help" level and above 100%
100%
100%
100%
 
100%    
BV226c
(NEW)
Spend on legal advice (housing and welfare benefits)provided directly by the council New New £0 £0  £0    
                 

Corporate Health Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV2a Level of the "Equality Standard for Local Government" the council meets level 1
Same performance
Level 1
Same performance
Level 1
Same performance
Level 1
Same performance
Level 2
Improved performance on previous year 
   
BV2b
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Promoting race equality (score against checklist of best practice) 32%
Improved performance on previous year
58%
Improved performance on previous year
63%
Improved performance on previous year
63%
Same performance 
63%    
BV3 performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of citizens satisfied with the overall service provided by the council 50%
Reduced performance on previous year 
50%
Reduced performance on previous year
50%
Reduced performance on previous year
 49%
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick  
BV4 performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % of those making a complaint satisfied with the handling of it 29%
Reduced performance on previous year 
29%
Reduced performance on previous year
29%
Reduced performance on previous year
 33%
Improved performance on previous year
 Next survey due September 2009    
BV8
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
% of invoices that were paid Promptly 96%
Improved performance on previous year 
94%
Reduced performance on previous year 
88%
Reduced performance on previous year
96%
Improved performance on previous year 
97%    
BV9
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils
Proportion of Council Tax collected 97.1%
Improved performance on previous year
97.3%
Improved performance on previous year
97.1%
Reduced performance on previous year 
97.3%
Improved performance on previous year 
97.16% Tick  
BV10 performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

Proportion of Business Rates collected

99.7%
Improved performance on previous year
99.5%
Reduced performance on previous year 
99.1%
Reduced performance on previous year
99%
Reduced performance on previous year
99.99% Tick  
BV156
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils
% of Council buildings in which all public areas are accessible to disabled persons 64%
Improved performance on previous year
70%
Improved performance on previous year
88%
Improved performance on previous year
89%
Improved performance on previous year
 89%    
BV11a
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils
% of top 5%earners that are women 19%
Same performance
19%
Same performance
36%
Improved performance on previous year 
35%
Same performance 
31%    
BV11b
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils
% of top 5% earners from black and ethnic communities 0%
Same performance
0%
Same performance
0%
Same performance
0%
Same performance
3.4%    
BV11c
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
% of top 5% earners that have a disability New 0% 4%
Improved performance on previous year
4%
Same performance 
3.4%    
BV12
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils
Average days per employee lost to sickness/absence 12.6
Reduced performance on previous year
10.6
Improved performance on previous year 
12.2
Reduced performance on previous year 
7.3
Improved performance on previous year 
 10.75    
BV14
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils
Early retirement as a % of workforce 1.8%
Improved performance on previous year
2.4%
Reduced performance on previous year 
3%
Reduced performance on previous year
0.76%
Improved performance on previous year 
 1.69    
BV15
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Ill health retirements as a % of workforce 0.7%
Reduced performance on previous year 
0.24%
Improved performance on previous year 
0.25%
Same performance 
0.25%
Same performance
0%    
BV16 performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of staff who are disabled (% of people with disabilities in Shepway) 1.8%
Reduced performance on previous year
(15.7%)
2.2%
Improved performance on previous year
(15.7%)
2.5%
Improved performance on previous year
(15.7%)
1.7%
Reduced performance on previous year 
(15.7%)
4.15%    
BV17 performance is among the top 25% of District Councils % of staff from minority ethnic communities (%ethnic minorities in Shepway) 2.6%
Improved performance on previous year
(3%)
4%
Improved performance on previous year
(3%)
3.3%
Reduced performance on previous year
(3%)
4.2%
Improved performance on previous year
(3%) 
2.42%    
                 

Cultural Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV119a performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with Sports/leisure facilities 48%
Reduced performance on previous year
48%
Reduced performance on previous year
48%
Reduced performance on previous year
49% 
Improved performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick  Tick
BV119d performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with Theatres/concert halls 49%
Reduced performance on previous year
49%
Reduced performance on previous year
 49%
Reduced performance on previous year
37% 
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick Tick 
BV119e performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with Parks and open spaces 76%
Improved performance on previous year
76%
Improved performance on previous year
 76%
Improved performance on previous year
 69%
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick Tick 
                 

Environmental Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV82ai performance is among the top 25% of District Councils % of total household waste recycled 17.6%
Improved performance on previous year
16%
Reduced performance on previous year 
23%
Improved performance on previous year 
26.79%
Improved performance on previous year
27.14% Tick Tick
BV82aii
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils
Tonnage of household waste recycled New 6800 9834
Improved performance on previous year
11256.85
Improved performance on previous year
 11337    
BV82bi performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils % of household waste composted 2%
Improved performance on previous year
10%
Improved performance on previous year
14%
Improved performance on previous year
12.57%
arrowdown_1.gif 
 12.81% Tick Tick
BV82bii
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Tonnage of household waste composted New 4300 5897
Improved performance on previous year
5280.9
Reduced performance on previous year 
 5355    
BV84a
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils
Kg of household waste collected per head 395 433 404 412.46  419   Tick 
BV84b performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % change in kg of household waste collected per head from previous year 14%
Reduced performance on previous year 
10%
Improved performance on previous year 
-6.7%
Improved performance on previous year
2.09%
Reduced performance on previous year 
5.77%    
BV86 performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

Cost of waste collection per household

£28.62 £33.29 £73.39 £54.21 Not yet availalbe    
BV89 performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with cleanliness standards 62%
Improved performance on previous year
62%
Improved performance on previous year
62%
Improved performance on previous year
 60%
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick  
BV90a performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with household waste collection 70%
Improved performance on previous year
70%
Improved performance on previous year
 70%
Improved performance on previous year
 66%
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick  
BV90b performance is among the top 25% of District Councils % of residents satisfied with recycling facilities 89%
Improved performance on previous year
89%
Improved performance on previous year
 89%
Improved performance on previous year
 76%
Reduced performance on previous year
Next survey due September 2009 Tick  
BV91a
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils
% of population served by kerbside collection of recyclables 100%
Same performance
100%
Same performance
100%
Same performance
85%
Reduced performance on previous year as now not collected from flats 
 85%    
BV91b
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

% of population served by a kerbside collection of at least two recyclables

New 33% 85%
Improved performance on previous year
85%
Same performance 
85%    
BV166
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

Score against a checklist of Environmental Enforcement best practice

60%
Improved performance on previous year 
70%
Improved performance on previous year
70%
Same performance 
70%
Same performance
70%
Same performance 
  Tick 
BV199a
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils

% of streets that fall below an acceptable level of cleanliness

No data 35% 27%
Improved performance on previous year
18%
Improved performance on previous year
 10% Tick Tick
BV199b performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of streets with unacceptable levels of graffiti are visible New New 9% 4%
Improved performance on previous year
 3% Tick  
BV199c performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils % of streets with unacceptable levels of fly-posting are visible New New 2% 1%
Improved performance on previous year
1% Tick  
BV199d

Grading based on fly-tipping incidents and enforcement actions taken

New New 2 2  3 Tick  
BV216a

Number of "sites of potential concern" with respect to land contamination

New 100 374 374 92    
BV216b

% of "sites of potential concern" with information to decide whether remediation of the land is necessary

New 0% 6% 6% 32%    
BV217

% of pollution control improvements to existing installations completed on time

New 50% 94%
Improved performance on previous year
100%
Improved performance on previous year
100%     
BV218a performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils

% of new reports of abandoned vehicles investigated within 24hrs

New New 73% 85%
Improved performance on previous year
 75% Tick  
BV218b performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

% of abandoned vehicles removed within 24hrs from when the council can do so

New New 79% 89%
Improved performance on previous year
 85.7% Tick  
                 

Housing Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV63
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

Energy efficiency -average SAP rating of council dwellings

64.5
Improved performance on previous year
65.5
Improved performance on previous year
66.5
Improved performance on previous year
67.76
Improved performance on previous year
 68.53   Tick 
BV64
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Empty private sector dwellings re-occupied through council action 21
Improved performance on previous year
29
Improved performance on previous year
58
Improved performance on previous year
34
Reduced performance on previous year 

51
Improved performance on previous year

Tick  
BV66a
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Proportion of rent collected 97.6%
Improved performance on previous year 
97.6%
Same performance 
98.2%
Improved performance on previous year 
98.4%
Improved performance on previous year
 98.39% Tick Tick
BV66b performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

% of local authority tenants with more than seven weeks of rent arrears

New N/a  4.3% 3.5% 3.46%    
BV66c performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils % of local authority tenants in arrears who have had Notices Seeking Possession served New 29.5% 32%
Reduced performance on previous year
15.2%
Improved performance on previous year 
 13.8%    
BV66d performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

% of local authority tenants evicted as a result of rent arrears

New 10% 0.4%
Improved performance on previous year
0%
Improved performance on previous year

 0.14%

   
BV74 performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

Council tenant satisfaction with overall service for:

   

 

    Tick  
 

a) All tenants

77%
Reduced performance on previous year
77%
Reduced performance on previous year
 77%
Reduced performance on previous year
82%
Improved performance on previous year
Next survey due 2009    
 

b) Black and minority ethnic tenants

55%
Reduced performance on previous year
55%
Reduced performance on previous year
 55%
Reduced performance on previous year
 65%
Improved performance on previous year
Next survey due 2009    
 

c) Non-black and minority ethnic tenants

77%
Reduced performance on previous year
77%
Reduced performance on previous year
 77%
Reduced performance on previous year
82%
Improved performance on previous year
Next survey due 2009    
BV75 performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

Council tenant satisfaction withparticipation in management for:

          Tick  
 

a) All tenants

70%
Improved performance on previous year
70%
Improved performance on previous year
  70%
Improved performance on previous year
 69 %
Same performance
Next survey due 2009    
 

b) Black and minority ethnic tenants

56%
Improved performance on previous year
56%
Improved performance on previous year
  56%
Improved performance on previous year
 56 %
Same performance
Next survey due 2009    
  c) Non-black and minority ethnic tenants 70%
Improved performance on previous year
70%
Improved performance on previous year
 70%
Improved performance on previous year
 69 %
Same performance
Next survey due 2009    
BV164
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils
Does the authority follow the Commission for Racial Equality's code of practice? Yes
Same performance
Yes
Same performance
Yes
Same performance
Yes
Same performance
Yes   Tick 
BV183i
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Average length of stay in Bed and Breakfast for vulnerable households (weeks) 7.7
Improved performance on previous year
9.6
Reduced performance on previous year 
6
Improved performance on previous year 
2.9
Improved performance on previous year
 3.0   Tick
BV183ii
performance is below average but not in the worst 25% of District Councils
Average length of stay in Hostels for vulnerable households (weeks) 37.5
Reduced performance on previous year
32
Improved performance on previous year 
29
Improved performance on previous year
12.4
Improved performance on previous year
11   Tick
BV184a
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
Proportion of authority homes which were non-decent at 1/4/04 38%
Improved performance on previous year
31%
Improved performance on previous year
20.5%
Improved performance on previous year
15.02%
Improved performance on previous year
 25% Tick Tick
BV184b performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils

% change in proportion of non-decent authority homes during the year

6%
Reduced performance on previous year 
30%
Improved performance on previous year 
28.4%
Reduced performance on previous year 
27.36%
Reduced performance on previous year
 51.5%    
BV185
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

% of responsive repairs for which the authority made and kept an appointment

98.4%
Improved performance on previous year
99.8%
Improved performance on previous year
99.3%
Reduced performance on previous year 
99.1%
Reduced performance on previous year
 99%   Tick 
BV202
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
The number of people sleeping rough on a single night within Shepway New Less than 10 1
Improved performance on previous year
1
arrowsame.gif 
Not yet available    
BV203
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

% change in average number of vulnerable families placed in temporary accommodation

New 5.97% 25%
Reduced performance on previous year
-18.24%
arrowup_1.gif 
Not yet availalbe    
BV212 performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

Average time taken to re-let local authority housing

20 days 33 days
Reduced performance on previous year
28 days
Improved performance on previous year 
25 days
Improved performance on previous year
30.7   Tick
BV213
performance is among the top 25% of District Councils

Number of homelessness cases prevented

New 49 176
Improved performance on previous year
205
Improved performance on previous year

220 cases in total

This equates to 5 cases per 1000 population

   
BV214
performance is amongst the worst 25% of District Councils

% of homeless families previously accepted as homeless within the last two years

New 6.5% 13%
Reduced performance on previous year
1%
Improved performance on previous year
Not yet available    
                 

Planning Performance Indicators

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 Priorities
Ref Description           SDC CPA
BV106 % of new homes built on previously developed land 78%
Reduced performance on previous year 
74%
Reduced performance on previous year
n/a 60% (est)  Not yet available    
BV109a
performance is above average but not in the top 25% of District Councils
% of major applications determined in 13 weeks 63%
Reduced performance on previous year
62%